Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +41%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
480
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Turks
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy