Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro W4300

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +224%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Dec 2015
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Bonaire
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy