Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600 +182%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
G94B
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy