Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600 +83%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
320
Shading Units
96
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
G92B
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy