Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (69W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600 +71%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2010
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
320
Shading Units
96
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
69W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT215
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy