Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600 +13%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
320
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
G92B
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy