Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +183%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2017
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Lexa
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy