Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Feb 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
1408
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
R500
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy