Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
16 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy