Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jul 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
-
Shading Units
144
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GF116
-
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
R500
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy