Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
R500
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy