Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
-
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy