Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 230W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
May 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.72 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.333 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
138.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-425-A2
R500
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy