Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Sep 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
-
Shading Units
9728
4
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
320W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy