Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Sep 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
R500
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy