Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 10GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Sep 2020
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
10GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
760.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
68
-
Shading Units
8704
4
TMUs
272
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
272
-
RT Cores
68
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
465.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.77 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
29.77 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
465.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
320W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-200-KD-A1
R500
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy