Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 350W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 's Advantages
Released 18 years late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (973.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
10752 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2025
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
973.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
84
-
Shading Units
10752
4
TMUs
336
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
316.8 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
831.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
53.22 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
53.22 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
831.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
350W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GB203
-
GPU Variant
GB203-400-A1
R500
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
0
0.107 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
377 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
10.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy