Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Sep 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
R500
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy