Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 6950 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Dec 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1408
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
563.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 3
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy