Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon PRO V710

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon PRO V710

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 28GB VRAM Radeon PRO V710 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 158W)
AMD Radeon PRO V710 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (28GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Oct 2024
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
28GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
224bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
504.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
54
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3456
4
TMUs
216
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
54
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
54 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.30 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
27.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
864.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
158W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Navi 32
-
GPU Variant
Navi 32
R500
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy