Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2019
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
R500
Architecture
GCN 5.1
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy