Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 125W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1855MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Feb 2020
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1744 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1855 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1408
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.36 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.45 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
5.224 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
326.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
R500
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy