Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro D500

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro D500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy