Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
May 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy