Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 550

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon RX 550 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1183MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1211 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1211 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
75.71 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy