Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 7500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2300MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1452 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2300 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.60 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
147.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.84 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
9.421 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
294.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Navi 33
-
GPU Variant
Navi 33
R500
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy