Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 345W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1677MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2017
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1406 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1677 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.3 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
429.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.48 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
858.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
345W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX
R500
Architecture
GCN 5.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy