Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W9000

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy