Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1010GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 +257962%
82.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1010GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
128
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
16384
4
TMUs
512
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
AD102
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy