ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro RG220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
+150%
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
M93
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
