Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +1390%
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
40
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GT200B
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy