Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.52TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
21720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 5090 +326150%
104.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2025
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1875 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1.52TB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
170
40
Shading Units
21760
4
TMUs
680
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
680
-
RT Cores
170
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
88 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1632 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
104.4 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.4 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.632 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GB202
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GB202-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
0
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
10.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy