Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 435 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 435 OEM +1959%
0.659 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2016
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
41.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Hainan
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy