Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 580

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 580

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 185W)
AMD Radeon RX 580 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1340MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 580 +19196%
6.175 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1257 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1340 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.88 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.175 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.175 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
385.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Polaris 20
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XTX (215-0910038)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy