Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
40 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1650 AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Feb 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
RV530
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy