Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 3000

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 3000

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
288 additional rendering cores
Intel HD Graphics 3000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1300MHz vs 905MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +179%
0.695 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 3000
0.249 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2011
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
249.6 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Sandy Bridge GT2+
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 6.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
32 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
1.16 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
216 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy