Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 400

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 400

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (905MHz vs 600MHz)
288 additional rendering cores
Intel HD Graphics 400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (6W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +504%
0.695 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 400
0.115 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2015
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-T
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
320 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
600 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
115.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
28.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
6W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Braswell GT1
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 8.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.3
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy