Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1100MHz vs 905MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU +143%
1.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2020
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
0 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.379 TFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.690 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
422.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Tiger Lake GT2
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy