Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (905MHz vs 600MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +351%
0.695 TFLOPS
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
0.154 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2016
Trinity
Generation
Stoney Ridge
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
600 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
153.6 GFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
153.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
9.600 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Stoney
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
32 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
1.2 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy