Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV516
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy