Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +2143%
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220 OEM
0.097 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1280
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.048 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.096 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
97.15 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
58W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT215
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy