Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +2076%
2.176 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF119
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy