Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

AMD FirePro M4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 M260 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260 +8%
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
940 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Chelsea
GPU Name
Topaz
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy