Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro W6150M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M +26%
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Emerald
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy