Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD FirePro RG220A vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +680%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Feb 2012
FirePro Remote
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy