Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD FirePro RG220A vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +2220%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro Remote
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy