Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD FirePro W4100

AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100 +706%
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro Remote
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy