Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +570%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
80
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy