Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM +2535%
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
960
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
GK106
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy