Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 +7963%
6.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Jan 2020
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
80
Shading Units
1920
8
TMUs
120
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-150-KC-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy